Comments on: Content is muck https://blog.richardmillwood.net/2008/11/24/content-is-muck/ A new learning landscape Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:52:02 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Richard Millwood https://blog.richardmillwood.net/2008/11/24/content-is-muck/comment-page-1/#comment-20357 Thu, 30 Jul 2009 07:52:02 +0000 http://blog.richardmillwood.net/?p=97#comment-20357 The fund you refer to was announced a month ago and my reading is that a task force will consider the way in which the money is spent, so I await developments.

I am confident it is right to invest in this area, but not confident about the vision to innovate HE itself, as well as innovate in the delivery of existing HE.

My feeling is that these need to happen hand-in-hand and that such radical innovation is opposed by the culture of HE.

In my view, HE culture is one of conservatism, maintaining a narcissistic self-image of high quality that is not fully accurate nor suited to the needs of learners in a widened participation and gobal context!

]]>
By: Paul Bacsich https://blog.richardmillwood.net/2008/11/24/content-is-muck/comment-page-1/#comment-20326 Wed, 29 Jul 2009 16:49:22 +0000 http://blog.richardmillwood.net/?p=97#comment-20326 Hi Richard – how have your views changed in the light of the HEFCE Online Learning Innovation Fund?

Paul

]]>
By: Malcolm https://blog.richardmillwood.net/2008/11/24/content-is-muck/comment-page-1/#comment-7744 Sun, 30 Nov 2008 22:02:07 +0000 http://blog.richardmillwood.net/?p=97#comment-7744 I agree with you view Richard.

The report is more fog than foresight. It almost completely avoids the issue which has constrained the use of ICT both at HE and school level. That is the attempt to graft a post industrial approach onto an industrial and even pre-industrial education and administrative system.

An example is the mention of plagiarism and collaborative learning where does one start and the other end? How should assessment and accreditation be radically changed, as it must if the vision is to be realised?

How may students be enabled to mix and match the institutions, people and information sources with which they choose to study.

How can they ‘pay’ for those distributed sources which inevitably involve crossing physical and institutional borders?

These are fundamentals which need addressing with some urgency.

]]>