Comments on: Research community https://blog.richardmillwood.net/2010/03/26/research-community/ A new learning landscape Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:07:30 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Tom https://blog.richardmillwood.net/2010/03/26/research-community/comment-page-1/#comment-27222 Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:07:30 +0000 http://blog.richardmillwood.net/?p=232#comment-27222 “Rasing generic issues”? … Cool! 🙂

]]> By: Tools, Toys and Training : Tom Smith’s: theOTHERblog https://blog.richardmillwood.net/2010/03/26/research-community/comment-page-1/#comment-27221 Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:03:35 +0000 http://blog.richardmillwood.net/?p=232#comment-27221 […] I was just saying to Richard Millwood, during trialling software with different teams we found that the way the permissions model is […]

]]> By: Tom https://blog.richardmillwood.net/2010/03/26/research-community/comment-page-1/#comment-27219 Fri, 02 Apr 2010 07:24:59 +0000 http://blog.richardmillwood.net/?p=232#comment-27219 Exactly… I expressed that in a worse and geekier way as “Is the privacy and permissions model well communicated?” … which was a key factor when judging tools for my Collaborative Tools Project at York.

http://www.theotherblog.com/Articles/2010/03/27/tools-and-more-requirements/

Everyone also needs to be sensitive to what “in” and “out” is… because people will naturally squirrel themselves away, in a private space (and beaver away on private stuff) and then there is no “us”… I just watched it happen on a trial we did… one where teams have spaces private to themselves and another where people have to ask to make spaces private… two very different outcomes.

]]>